Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PurpleFloyd's avatar

Excellent analysis. Now before you read the below, let me add this disclaimer: YES I think Wickes is undervalued, but then so is Kingfisher. So they are undervalued on market-wide basis but not on a peer-basis.

Howdens Joinery operates a very different business, so hard to use that as a comparable. Their clients lean more towards builders who know Howden's products, whereas Wickes customers are more DIY. Howden's business model is working well and it shows: they grew revenue at an insane rate last year.

Kingfisher is a better company to use as a comparable, while they also seem undervalued their business is much more similar to Wickes' than compared to Howdens. Wickes is more DIY than "Do it for me". Although Wickes will try and compete in the "Do it for me" market, they won't get far as this is Howden's game completely. Wickes is going to play catch-up.

TPT shouldn't be used as a comparable. B&M also, should not be used as a comparable. Different market. I'm even nervous to use TPK as a comparable because they are a builder's merchant.

So best comparables I can see here are Kingfisher, Howden's. Howden's deserves a better multiple, they have a better more innovative faster growing business...Kingfisher trades relatively the same.

Expand full comment
jefke's avatar

Thorough write up of what seems to be an insanely cheap company 🙏

The big question for me is capital allocation though. Why do they even have so much net cash? Time for some buybacks!

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts